Project Criteria Rubrics
criteria |
Unsatisfactory |
Improvement Needed |
Satisfactory |
Exceptional |
---|---|---|---|---|
Project champions |
Lacking at least one full-time HKUST faculty or staff to take ownership and lead the project. |
Single HKUST faculty or staff as the lead / point of contact. |
Small dedicated team within one specialized unit, with one dedicated team leader and others committed to support. |
An interdisciplinary team with a diverse member set, preferably with student and/or alumni involvement; with one dedicated team leader and others committed to support. |
Stage of development |
Requests for seed grant, basic research, entrepreneurship. |
Project ideas with reasonable opportunity for campus, but lack definition or concrete steps for implementation. |
Idea is further developed with a general budget, rough outline, and implementation timeline. Shared idea with campus operations staff (FMO, etc). A demonstrable prototype or pilot has been developed. |
Idea has well-defined project scope of work, line-level budget, timeline, and locations for implementation. Incorporated feedback from campus operations staff (FMO, etc). A demonstrable prototype or pilot has been developed. |
Visibility and Educational Potential |
Projects with zero potential for broad educational outcomes for the community; or no potential for follow-on research or knowledge transfer. |
Projects that appeal only to people who specialize in the field; limited ability to showcase the technology or approach. Some data or information generated with potential for follow-on work. |
Internal or external projects that appeal to more than one stakeholder group, with some visible learning opportunities identified. Identification of KPIs and data potential for future follow-on projects. |
"Home-grown” projects that are designed to engage multiple stakeholder groups and have potential for high visibility within the campus. Identification of KPIs and data potential for future follow-on projects, with specifics carved-out for student hands-on projects like UROP/USEL or service learning experiences. |
Sustainable and Smart |
Projects that cannot satisfy definitions. |
Projects that have marginal smart or sustainable benefits, but not combined. |
Projects that can demonstrate positive sustainable and smart elements. |
Projects that satisfy the definitions in ways that provide a clear demonstration of how the approach is a model for the vision, and would be a clear source of inspiration and pride for the HKUST community |
Value for money |
Projects that cannot demonstrate a positive value for money proposition; are lacking life-cycle cost/benefit description, and no end-of life plan. |
Value for money as defined through a life-cycle cost benefit analysis. Includes some end of life considerations; acknowledgement of staff expectations. |
Positive value for money in life-cycle CBA, clearly defined end-of-life strategy; identification of specific operations staff and plan for hand-over. |
Positive value for money in life-cycle CBA, clearly defined end-of-life strategy with salvage / recycling plan; clear and accepted roles for admin staff for hand-over. |